RRI Tenure Region Latin America
Latin America
RRI’s Tenure Tracking Data assesses global advances and setbacks regarding Indigenous Peoples’, Afro-descendant Peoples’, local communities’, and the women within these communities’ legally recognized rights to forests, land, and natural resources. Explore data from Latin America.
Explorez les ensembles de données disponibles :
Données sur la tenure forestière
Données sur la tenure forestière
Données sur le régime foncier
Données sur le régime foncier
Données sur la propriété de l'eau
Données sur la propriété de l'eau
Change in Distribution of Forest Tenure in 9 Countries in Latin America, 2002-2017
2002200820132017


RRI’s Forest Tenure Database tracks the statutory distribution of Forest Tenure going back to 2002. Under RRI’s typology, all forest area in the countries studied are classified as either: (1) Government Administered; (2) Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and local communities; (3) Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and local communities; or (4) Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms. To read more about the methodology underpinning this classification, click here.

Bundle of Rights - Latin America

For … countries in Latin America, RRI maintains detailed qualitative data on the strength of Forest Tenure rights legally held by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and local communities. Learn more about RRI’s Bundle of Rights Methodology here.

The rights of communities and their members to enter a forest area.
Communities’ right to benefit from harvesting non-timber forest products (NTFPs) for subsistence (partial credit) or commercial (full credit) purposes, subject to the terms and limits of management plans and/or licenses and environmental and other legislation.
Communities’ right to benefit from harvesting timber for subsistence (partial credit) or commercial (full credit) purposes, subject to the terms and limits of management plans and/or licenses and environmental and other legislation.
Communities’ right to regulate and make decisions about forests to which they have recognized rights (full credit)–or to participate on a management board or other co-management arrangement (partial credit)–within the limits of management plans and environmental and other legislation.
The right of communities to refuse outsiders (other individuals, groups, or entities) access to and use of a particular resource.
Communities’ right to judicially appeal government efforts to extinguish, alienate, or revoke one, several, or all of the communities’ rights, and to receive compensation if such challenges fail.
Communities’ right to temporarily transfer their land rights to others.
Communities’ right to transfer their land rights to others as collateral in order to access a mortgage or other line of credit.
Communities’ right to sell their land.
Pas de créditCrédit partielCrédit completNot AddressedCase by CaseTo Be Determined

Source: RRI. 2017. Depth of Rights Database.

Distribution of Forest Tenure by Country

Explore country-level data on the distribution of Forest Tenure over time. Click on the country name to learn more about the legal frameworks recognizing community-based tenure, including the rights of Indigenous, Afro-descendant, and community women.

Pays

Administré par le gouvernement

2002 2017

Désigné pour les peuples autochtones, les peuples d'ascendance africaine et les communautés locales

2002 2017

Propriété des peuples autochtones, des peuples d'ascendance africaine et des communautés locales

2002 2017

Propriété privée de particuliers et d'entreprises

2002 2017
Pays: Argentine
Government Administered
2002: 5,70
2017: n.d.
Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: n.d.
2017: 0,87
Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: -
2017: -
Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
2002: 22,20
2017: n.d.
Pays: Bélize
Government Administered
2002: n.d.
2017: n.d.
Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: n.d.
2017: -
Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: -
2017: n.d.
Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
2002: n.d.
2017: n.d.
Pays: Bolivie
Government Administered
2002: 41,43
2017: 28,03
Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: 1,58
2017: 0,47
Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: 16,61
2017: 24,71
Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
2002: 0,48
2017: 1,55
Pays: Brésil
Government Administered
2002: 341,02
2017: 238,39
Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: 10,68
2017: 40,41
Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: 75,27
2017: 118,05
Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
2002: 94,29
2017: 99,89
Pays: Chili
Government Administered
2002: n.d.
2017: 5,49
Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: n.d.
2017: n.d.
Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: n.d.
2017: 0,86
Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
2002: n.d.
2017: 11,32
Pays: Colombie
Government Administered
2002: 38,00
2017: 26,38
Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: -
2017: -
Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: 24,50
2017: 32,93
Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
2002: -
2017: -
Pays: Costa Rica
Government Administered
2002: 1,11
2017: 1,10
Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: -
2017: -
Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: 0,34
2017: 0,28
Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
2002: 1,32
2017: 1,06
Pays: Équateur
Government Administered
2002: n.d.
2017: n.d.
Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: -
2017: 0,02
Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: -
2017: 1,27
Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
2002: n.d.
2017: n.d.
Pays: Guatemala
Government Administered
2002: 1,85
2017: n.d.
Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: 0,53
2017: 0,40
Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: 0,29
2017: 1,20
Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
2002: 1,53
2017: n.d.
Pays: Guyana
Government Administered
2002: 16,62
2017: 13,17
Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: -
2017: 3,35
Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: -
2017: -
Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
2002: 0,00
2017: 0,00
Pays: Honduras
Government Administered
2002: 4,07
2017: 1,18
Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: -
2017: 0,60
Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: 0,00
2017: 1,79
Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
2002: 1,36
2017: 1,80
Pays: Mexique
Government Administered
2002: 2,75
2017: 3,65
Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: -
2017: -
Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: 44,00
2017: 45,47
Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
2002: 8,30
2017: 16,92
Pays: Panama
Government Administered
2002: 3,92
2017: 3,63
Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: n.d.
2017: n.d.
Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: 0,90
2017: 0,90
Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
2002: 0,04
2017: 0,08
Pays: Pérou
Government Administered
2002: 58,77
2017: 54,38
Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: 1,57
2017: 4,98
Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: 10,52
2017: 12,78
Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
2002: 5,29
2017: 0,12
Pays: Suriname
Government Administered
2002: 15,30
2017: 15,11
Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: -
2017: -
Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: -
2017: -
Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
2002: 0,09
2017: 0,09
Pays: Venezuela
Government Administered
2002: 49,15
2017: n.d.
Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: 0,00
2017: n.d.
Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: -
2017: -
Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
2002: -
2017: -
Pays: Subtotal, Complete Case LMICs in Latin America (9 countries)
Government Administered
2002: 519,07
2017: 381,40
Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: 13,84
2017: 49,81
Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: 171,24
2017: 236,01
Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
2002: 111,13
2017: 121,43
Pays: Total, Latin America (16 countries)
Government Administered
2002: 579,69
2017: 390,53
Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: 14,38
2017: 51,10
Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
2002: 172,44
2017: 240,25
Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
2002: 134,91
2017: 132,83

Highlighting in gray indicates Complete Case Countries.
Dashes (-) denote situations in which the tenure category in question is not legally possible under national law.
n.d. = No Data
Source: RRI. 2018. At a Crossroads: Trends in Recognition of Community-Based Forest Tenure from 2002-2017.

Women’s Rights to Community Forests

RRI’s Gender Database builds on RRI’s Bundle of Rights methodology to assess the extent to which the same countries’ legal frameworks recognize Indigenous, Afro-descendant, and community women’s specific rights to community forests, and whether or not those countries are meeting their obligations under national and international laws. Learn more about RRI’s Gender Methodology here.

The CBTR explicitly defines women as community members (full credit), as opposed to defining membership as extending to all adults/households (partial credit).
Non applicable Case by Case Pas de crédit Crédit partiel Crédit complet
Mpgyi